CEO Insight: Advancing Religious Freedom  

In the current political climate of tension, strained relationships and polarisation many of our rights are coming under fire. Among those rights is the fundamental right to freedom of religious belief. 

Around the world millions are attacked, imprisoned, or sometimes killed for their religious beliefs and incidents are increasing. 

Harassment of religious groups by governments or social actors occurred in 192 out of the world’s 198 countries and territories in 2022, according to the Pew Institute. 

Through our work at A4ID, I have witnessed firsthand the impact of religious persecution and how it leads to eroding the very fabric of pluralist societies and the democratic process. 

Often, when we find freedom of religion restricted, we also find broader human rights under threat too.  

Whether intolerance or systematic violence and repression, any attack on the freedom of religious belief shakes the very foundations of peaceful societies and puts back our hopes of building a better world. Now more than ever, it’s imperative we act.  

A Crisis for Religious Freedom 

In recent years, we have seen an alarming rise in religiously motivated violence and discrimination. From the ongoing persecution of the Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, where military-led violence has displaced over a million people, forcing them into refugee camps in neighbouring Bangladesh, to the Uyghur Muslim population in China, who faces severe state repression, including mass detentions and forced assimilation efforts, a crisis that has drawn widespread international condemnation.  

These cases underscore the vulnerability of religious minorities and the critical need for robust protection. And as these threats continue to escalate, it is crucial for lawyers, human rights advocates, and development organisations to defend religious freedom. 

Freedom of religious belief (FoRB) is not just a fundamental human right, it essential for individuals and society to flourish. FoRB means inclusive communities where people are free to practice faith without fear of persecution, it means building resilience against extremism and it means standing for the dignity and safety of all people.  

When religious freedoms are upheld, it strengthens social stability, enhances economic development, and supports democratic governance – key pillars for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).  
 
Marginalizing religious groups or restricting their rights not only infringes on their fundamental freedoms but also impedes socio-economic progress, creating barriers to development that reverberate across society.  
 

​Global Trends and Developments 

In recent years, significant strides have been made globally to promote and protect freedom of religion or belief (FoRB). The United Nations General Assembly has consistently adopted resolutions reinforcing this fundamental right, most recently in October 2021, emphasizing the need for tolerance, non-discrimination, and the elimination of violence based on religion or belief. Similarly, the European Union has demonstrated leadership by advocating for FoRB at international forums and providing substantial financial support to initiatives aimed at combating religious intolerance. Notably, the International Association for Religious Freedom, established in 1900, continues to play a pivotal role in fostering interfaith dialogue and advocating for religious freedom worldwide. 

Despite these advances, the troubling global trend highlights the fragility of religious freedom in certain regions. By amplifying legal frameworks, supporting grassroots movements, and advocating for policy reforms we can help ensure that the rights of religious minorities are protected, and that freedom of religion and belief remains a global priority. 

Empowering Advocates and Communities  

At A4ID, we work at the intersection of law, sustainable development, and human rights. We recognise that the protection of religious freedom is intrinsically linked to the success of our collective global goals such as the SDGs and is essential in ensuring that no one is left behind. 

We are working to strengthen religious freedom through innovative partnerships and impactful projects. One example is our collaboration with the Legal Aid Society in Pakistan to empower local communities in protecting religious freedom.  

In March, six legal experts from Karachi conducted training sessions for members of the District Peace Committees (DPC) in Sindh province. These government-designated bodies play a pivotal role in promoting religious harmony and preventing conflict at community level. Despite constitutional protections, religious minorities in Pakistan continue to face systemic discrimination. This project focuses on enhancing the capacity of DPCs, equipping them with the tools to address minority issues, foster social cohesion, and reduce violence. By strengthening these local institutions, A4ID is helping to create a more inclusive society where the protection of religious freedoms becomes an achievable reality. 

Another example is A4ID’s project with the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute seeking to train and empower human rights defenders from around the world to be able to document FoRB violations and effectively engage international mechanisms. This included sixteen virtual training sessions as well as two high-profile roundtables in London and Washington DC. The project brought together key stakeholders to share experiences and learn new skills, including advocacy skills, aimed at effective engagement with ultimate goal of improving state compliance with international human rights standards, and providing defenders with the tools to document violations and engage international institutions. By facilitating capacity-building and creating platforms for dialogue, A4ID continues to contribute to the global movement for the protection and promotion of FoRB, ensuring that local and international defenders are equipped to safeguard religious freedom in challenging environments. 

Engaging Local Institutions and Communities 

The success of A4ID’s initiatives lies in their ability to engage local communities and institutions that are most relevant within the socio-political contexts they operate in. By working with District Peace Committees, A4ID taps into an existing framework of local governance that directly addresses community-level issues, fostering an environment for meaningful dialogue and change. Similarly, training human rights defenders from regions where religious freedoms are under threat, empowering them with the knowledge and skills necessary to navigate complex political landscapes and advocate for lasting reform. These projects demonstrate that when interventions are tailored to the local realities – building on existing institutions and networks – they are far more likely to create sustainable impact. 

A Call to Action 

As we reflect on the strides made in protecting freedom of religion and belief, one truth stands out: the legal community holds immense power – and responsibility – in advancing these fundamental rights. Lawyers, legal practitioners, and human rights defenders must go beyond upholding the law; they must be champions for stronger, more inclusive protections at both national and international levels. 

This involves engaging constructively with governments to uphold human rights obligations, offering pro bono legal support to individuals and communities facing religious persecution, and strengthening local legal systems to respond to violations with resilience and integrity. 

By leveraging their legal expertise, their influence, and their commitment to justice, legal professionals can be powerful agents of change – helping to shape a world where freedom of religion and belief is not only respected but actively protected for all. 

At A4ID, we believe in the power of law to create lasting impact. We call on our legal partners and allies to join us in this mission – stand with us as we work to defend religious freedom, reduce division, and build a future grounded in dignity, inclusion, and shared humanity. 

FoRB cuts across several UN SDGs. Find out about A4ID’s SDG Legal Initiative – a space for global legal professionals to take action through partnerships – and become part of the sustainability solution. 

To learn more about our FoRB work contact fizza.khawar@a4id.org 

SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities

For most of human history, most people across the world lived in small communities. However, rapid urbanisation over the last few decades has dramatically changed this landscape. Today, over half the world lives in cities – a trend that is anticipated to increase for a global population that is already growing year on year. To accomodate everyone, current and future generations to come, it is imperative we build modern and resource-efficient cities. But with challenges of overpopulation, a scarcity of space and resources, and growing pollution problems, it is no surprise that 1 billion people are currently living in urban slums.

To give access to everyone to adequate and safe housing, efficient public transport, and green spaces, SDG 11 looks towards making our cities ‘inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable’.

Better urban planning, including through participatory and inclusive local management, can help build cities that are more inclusive, healthier, and enjoy a more equitable distribution of resources.

SDG 10: Reduced Inequality

The core tenet of reducing inequalities underpins the entire SDG Agenda. As the guiding principle of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, to ‘leave no one behind’, SDG 10 embodies a notion key to sustainable development, highlighting the universal commitment for a world that benefits all persons. It is in this vein that SDG 10 focuses on the realisation of equal development through non-discriminatory practices, policies, and laws.

During and following the COVID-19 pandemic, countries with less robust social welfare protections, weaker health systems, and greater gender inequalities, were hit with greater setbacks in economic and social progress as a result of the pandemic, highlighting the importance of equality in developing resilience as well as growth. These setbacks caused the largest rise in income inequality in three decades; a clear example of the need for inclusivity as we build ourselves back. \

Equality before the law is a basic tenet of access to justice and a fundamental principle of the rule of law.

CEO Insight: Paving a New Path to Prosperity

Is it enough to save the planet? End world hunger? Or achieve gender equality?

The answer is surely a resounding ‘Yes’, but development encompasses more than just rectifying past injustices and overcoming challenges. It’s also about forging ahead towards sustainable growth and prosperity. This resonates with A4ID’s vision of poverty eradication: tackling injustices stemming from the absence of basic necessities, resources and rights, while simultaneously envisioning a future where support and empowerment lead to more effective positive changes for these communities.

As the Legatum Prosperity Index frames it, true prosperity occurs when “all people have the opportunity to thrive by fulfilling their unique potential and playing their part in strengthening their communities and nations.” This definition relies on three fundamental components: inclusivity that promotes the protection of all peoples and their liberties; an open economy that harnesses new ideas and fair and consistent regulation; and empowered people, whose mental and physical well-being is tantamount to prosperity, can determine their own paths free from poverty, and are enabled to reach their potential.

This nuanced understanding shows that prosperity and its attainment in society is multidimensional highlighting the requirement of collaborative action across public and private sectors ensuring that no one is left behind.

Prosperity and the Sustainable Development Goals

Within the framework of the SDG Agenda, prosperity stands out as one of the five fundamental aspirations for a better world. Embedded within SDGs 7 to 11, it is reflected in the goals on industrialisation, the growth of new enterprise, enhancing labour practices and promoting workplace welfare. Collectively these SDGs harness the potential of industry and its workforce to construct a more resilient, sustainable, and inclusive global community.

Humans, after all, dedicate a significant proportion of their lives to work, investing time and effort while acquiring new skills, knowledge and innovative ideas to improve their own lives and those of others. At the same time, industrial growth plays a pivotal role. It serves as a foundation upon which historical development has been built, offering a mechanism for generating new forms of value and bringing sustainable futures into existence. Leveraged effectively, this dynamic combination has the potential to expedite the achievement of several SDG targets beyond current projections.

Why do we think this? Because the opposite proved true. When global workforces ground to a halt, reversing progress in inclusive staffing and removing economic stability for large swathes of the population, numerous SDG benchmarks stagnated, if not regressed. The COVID-19 pandemic extended the 2030 SDG deadline further and from our reach, highlighting the critical importance of industry, labour, welfare, and healthy societies in the functioning of nation-states and the global order.

Simultaneously, this period called for a number of highly delicate trade-offs making tough decisions at a national level, where economic and social objectives often clashed. A 2022 study by the OECD found that the result has been only modest progress towards achieving the prosperity goals, given the need for both components to succeed in tandem.

White, it might be tempting to view the prosperity SDGs as split in half – one half focusing on the non-human aspects of industry (i.e.: SDGs 7, 9 and 11) and the other half focused on human labour (i.e.: SDGs 8 and 10)- within the SDG framework, these elemants are inherently intertwined. For instance, the objectives of SDG 8 aimed at safeguarding individual rights to decent work, encompassing safe working conditions, fair wages and social protection for families, direct contribute to creating workplaces conducive to inspiring innovative solutions for just transitions (SDG 7), developing new infrastructure (SDG 9) and creating more sustainable urban environments (SDG 11). Similarly, the goals of SDG 10 centred on reducing inequality within and among nations have knock on effects on SDG 8, where addressing discrimination necessitates ensuring equitable treatment and providing additional safeguards for vulnerable groups in workplaces, healthcare and social settings.

Measuring Prosperity

It is no wonder then, that there have long been calls to move away from the more conventional measure of a country’s prosperity solely through its GDP which is a metric that often misinterprets prosperity as merely profitability. Instead, recognising the importance if extending beyond monetary gains to include the value of social, human, and natural capital enables a broader consideration of externalities and dependencies within industry and commerce.

Consider this: while a surplus in goods may mean more profit, it could also lead to deficits in natural resources. Seen this way, the monetary gains are offset by the depletion of natural capital.  India serves as a prime example: the nation’s rapid economic growth and high productivity have driven GDP increases, but at the same time have reduced quality of natural resources, such as water contamination in Bengaluru’s lakes and air pollution in Delhi.

Revised metrics for measuring prosperity are therefore needed, and have been developed through frameworks such as the UNDP’s Human Development Index (HDI), measuring ‘prosperity’ across key aspects of human and social wellbeing. Factors such as life expectancy, education and a decent standard of living are regarded as fundamental in fostering prosperous communities. The Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI) goes further, accounting for the distribution of these achievements among citizens, emphasising the need for everyone to have access to opportunities to build a life free from poverty.

To realign all prosperity targets, these metrics provide a better means for reconciling the social and economic dimensions of the prosperity goals. Achieving this requires the adoption of a a human rights approach to industrialisation and economic growth models. It is here that the role of law firms and legal professionals becomes crucial, as they can advocate for and advise on private profit-driven interests while also upholding accountability to the rule of law and ensuring the proper administration of justice.

The Legal Sector’s Role in Achieving ‘Prosperity’ Goals

To achieve the SDG’s by 2030, we need everyone to adopt this redefined understanding of prosperity and its new measuring system-a feat that will require cross-sector support. Legal professionals will need to play a more critical role in advancing policies and legal frameworks that promote prosperity in line with sustainable development.

Over the past few years A4ID has published a Legal Guide to each of the Sustainable Development Goals. Aimed at empowering legal professionals in realising the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Agenda, each guide provides an overview of the specific ways that international and national legal frameworks relate to sustainability objectives.

During our Annual Conference focusing on “Responsible Business and the SDGs: A Roadmap to Prosperity” which takes place on the 21 may we will be launching Legal Guides focussing on Affordable Energy and Clean Energy(SDG 7), Decent Work and Economic Growth(SDG 8), Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure(SDG 9), Reduced Inequalities(SDG10) and Sustainable Cities and Communities(SDG11).

We hope these guides act as a reminder that while we do need to recover from the many crises facing today’s world, there is also a desire to work prospectively in building back better – championing a new path to prosperity.

They form part of A4ID’s wider call to action under the SDG Legal Initiative to see lawyers play a more active role in shaping and building a more sustainable and prosperous future for all.

Recommendations for the Legal Sector Include:

• Advocating for inclusive policies that prioritise the safety and protection of human rights; ensuring fair treatment in workplaces, healthcare, social contexts, and equal opportunities for all.

• Advising governments on creating frameworks for sustainable business practices that promote open economic growth, ensure fair and consistent regulation, and encourage innovation – particularly in clean energy and infrastructure.
• Contributing to the development and implementation of measuring systems that capture the multi-faceted nature of prosperity and wellbeing, promoting economic and social growth collectively, and
• Advocating for policies that require business and governments to account for negative externalities such as environmental degradation.
• Advising on industrial best practice to account for wider due diligence and risk factors, such as the externalities of business operations and trade-offs in decision making.

We welcome all stakeholders to take action by:

1. Reading the SDG Legal Guides for inspiration on how lawyers can better contribute to the goals of prosperity,
2. Contributing your expertise to a growing community of global legal professionals and sustainability champions under the SDG Legal Initiative, and
3. Joining us at the A4ID 2024 Annual Conference: ‘Responsible Business and the SDGs: A Roadmap to Prosperity’ so that we may continue these conversations openly, inclusively and proactively.

CEO Insight: Illuminating the Path for Clean Energy

In the wake of COP28, A4ID reflected on the commitments made toward a just transition, particularly in renewable energy generation. Indeed, on the 26 January, it was the inaugural International Day of Clean Energy when the global community refocused its attention on propelling the planet towards sustainable energy sources.

Universal access to affordable, reliable, and clean energy has long been a UN priority. Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7, centred around ‘affordable and clean energy,’ is a cornerstone of the SDG Agenda’s Prosperity Chapters, establishing clean energy as instrumental to a better standard of living for all. Furthermore, SDG 9, ‘industry, innovation and infrastructure,’ highlights the need to upgrade existing infrastructure and adopt clean technologies to meet sustainability commitments; and SDG 13, ‘climate action,’ reiterates the role of clean energy in combatting the climate crisis.

Why is Clean Energy a Priority?

The quest for clean energy is driven not only by environmental constraints, but by the stark reality that for millions, particularly in the Global South, access to consistent electricity remains a luxury. The International Energy Agency has estimated that over 760 million people are without electricity, emphasising the profound impact of energy poverty on basic and socio-economic needs including education and access to employment.  Energy poverty can have devastating effects, such as not being able to cook food or inadequate sanitation. Clean energy not only offers a path to addressing these challenges but also promises substantial opportunities for international development, green job creation, and socio-economic advancement.

Perhaps most notably, the imperative for climate action demands a substantial investment in clean energy. The aftermath of the Global Stocktake culminating at COP28 affirms the urgency to pivot energy systems away from fossil fuels to renewables. Currently, fossil fuels dominate the world’s energy supply at 80%, necessitating a substantial 6% reduction per year between 2020 and 2030 to limit global temperature increases per the Paris Agreement.

Taking Action for Clean Energy

Achieving these targets requires commitments on a global scale. However, it is essential that clean energy is pursued in a way that is equitable and yields just outcomes for all. At a global level, countries must address equity concerns by ensuring financial assistance is made available to countries less able to independently migrate to clean energy. COP27 & COP28 both made steps towards this with extensive discussions about climate finance, whereby wealthier countries are being asked to consider countries experiencing climate impacts more harshly – predominantly poorer countries. However, there are still prevalent concerns as to how soon climate finance funds will reach communities and the sufficiency of funds in the adaptation process. 

The equitable distribution of financial resources is paramount for clean energy endeavours, requiring innovation through research and development. Collaboration is not only essential but a prerequisite for creating more efficient and sustainable energy solutions. Technology sharing, especially with economically challenged nations, is a pivotal component of this collaborative effort.

At the local level, clean energy must directly benefit communities, particularly those in and around clean energy project sites. Action on clean energy must result in more equitable energy systems, where more people have access to affordable and reliable energy irrespective of their socio-economic status.

Cautionary Considerations

In navigating the trajectory toward an effective clean energy transition, governments must institute policy frameworks that incentivise sustainability and penalise environmentally harmful practices. This involves the removal of inefficient and unjust fossil fuel subsidies, and the creation of economic avenues for clean energy projects.

While the necessity for new infrastructure is acknowledged, it is paramount to respect ecosystems, biodiversity, and air and water quality during the implementation of clean energy projects. Central to this is the acknowledgment of Indigenous Land Rights, necessitating legal advocacy for Indigenous communities and frameworks that represent their interests in clean energy development. Moreover, new policy frameworks must account for the entire life cycle of clean energy projects, considering environmental, social, and economic impacts to ensure sustainability.

From a consumer standpoint, the cost-effectiveness of clean energy is pivotal. Renewable energy’s comparability in price to fossil fuels, as stated by the The International Renewable Energy Agency  emphasizes the potential for widespread adoption. As clean energy investment and infrastructure development progress, governments must implement price caps to ensure affordability for consumers, preventing profit-driven ‘carbon colonialism’ at the expense of local communities.

In this vein, the global community must collaborate to safeguard renewable energy from political conflict, insulating clean energy systems from disruptions and ensuring reliability and affordability for all.  Europe has seen soaring energy prices due to the escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian war emphasising the urgency of this united global effort.

Our call to action: Lawyers to Illuminate the Way Forward 

A4ID invites the legal community to recognise its essential role in achieving the multifaceted aspects of the clean energy goal and encourages active engagement in the pursuit of a sustainable future

• Learn from Leaders: Lawyers should look to leaders in clean energy to help bring laggards in line. Leaders involve a range of countries with varied legal systems (such as Sweden, Costa Rica, Iceland, Germany, Uruguay, and Kenya), providing a plethora of jurisdictions to learn from and adapt to specific circumstances

• Plan Carefully: Lawyers should plan urgently and with care, to ensure clean energy systems are resilient, do no harm, and deliver positive results across economies and communities

• Uphold Justice: Lawyers should uphold equity and justice in clean energy policy frameworks, ensure policy frameworks account for proper processes, and protect the rights of important communities and interest groups

• Public Interest: Lawyers should be guided by public interests when negotiating and drafting clean energy policies. Putting the well-being of the public at the heart of global practices. 

The mandate for clean energy, after all, transcends moral imperatives; it is a necessity for a liveable, sustainable future. Global stakeholders must collaboratively strive to achieve the targets set out in the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement, mitigating climate change and fostering an equitable and resilient world.

Join A4ID’s SDG Legal Initiative today to explore opportunities for collaboration and knowledge-sharing in the pursuit of global clean energy.

Legal Solutions for Sustainable Futures in South Asia: How Pro Bono Contributes to SDG Progress

This year marks the midpoint of the UN SDGs, during which stakeholders worldwide have converged to exchange insights on the strides made so far and to complement efforts for the challenges ahead. The actions taken to revive the SDG agenda have ignited imaginative initiatives, yet they’ve also encountered formidable hurdles. As we navigate this intricate landscape, A4ID partners globally exemplify diverse contributions to SDG success, with the legal community emerging as essential allies to the cause.

Commissioned as part of A4ID’s Rule of Law Expertise (ROLE UK) Programme and in celebration of A4ID’s expanding network of change leaders in South Asia, the unique case studies and insights presented in this report provide the necessary focus on our work, inspire you and other legal professionals in the region to
get involved, fortifying our collective resolve to build upon the compelling and essential case for change.

Download the Executive Summary

Download the Regional Snapshot

Download the Report on Bangladesh and SDG 5

Download the Report on Nepal and SDG 13

Download the Report on India and SDG 16

Legal Solutions for Sustainable Futures in South Asia serve as a remarkable testament to demonstrate what is achievable.

Yasmin Batliwala MBE, Chief Executive, A4ID

Shaping the Future: Lawyers at the Vanguard of AI and Sustainable Development

On the 1 and 2 November the first ever global artificial intelligence (AI) Safety Summit will be held in London. Its focus is to “fully embrace the extraordinary opportunities of AI” and “to ensure it develops safely in the years ahead” according to our Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak. An essential prerequisite to success appears to be the need to work closely with leading nations to agree a shared approach to harness AI for international development.

Certainly, as AI continues to advance at an extraordinary pace, understanding its likely impact is paramount and more so in countries in the Global South. For this reason, the role of the law and lawyers in shaping this transformation is of utmost importance and requires utmost speed.

AI is transforming our world, offering solutions to complex challenges. One of the most pressing global initiatives is the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which represent a shared vision for a better future. These 17 goals aim to address various issues from poverty and hunger to climate change and gender equality. SDG 17, “Partnership for the Goals,” encompasses two vital targets, 17.7 and 17.8, emphasising the necessity of sustainable technologies in developing nations. Moreover, SDG 9 focusing on “Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure” whose target SDG 9.8 emphasises universal access to information and communications technology as a cornerstone for ensuring equal access to information and financial markets, in turn facilitating job creation and resilient infrastructure. The critical role of technology makes it a linchpin for attaining all the SDG targets by 2030.

AI’s Current Role in SDG Implementation

In a world witnessing an unprecedented pace of technological advancement, AI has taken undoubtably taken centre stage. The proliferation of AI, facilitated by user-friendly platforms like ChatGPT, has made it more accessible than ever. Consequently, it is unsurprising, that AI is increasingly seen as the solution to achieving SDGs. Predictive AI, for example, is being rapidly deployed in the Global South for agriculture, healthcare and infrastructure as a means of reducing inequality in resource-constrained environments. In areas where a shortage of skilled personal hampers efforts to tackle socio-economic and political problems perpetuating inequality, AI can be harnessed to asses causes and solutions.

One salient application of AI is in drone technology. Drones have been implemented in the Global South as a means of delivering essential medical and agricultural supplies to remote areas that are hard to reach by traditional means. They are also used for aerial observation, improving agricultural methods, enhancing crop productivity, and providing farmers with real-time data on their crops. Al technology opens doors to rapid development opportunities for the Global South, bypassing the otherwise costly and time-consuming processes. However, as reliance on AI grows, so do concerns about its potential negative consequences.

The Ethical and Regulatory Challenges

Alongside the development sector, AI has attracted interest and investment from international businesses raising ethical concerns. The absence of a comprehensive regulatory body overseeing AI’s development, deployment, and use has given rise to worries regarding corporate interests.

AI algorithms, designed by humans, have been found to perpetuate biases existing in society. Reports have shown that AI used in Courts displayed racial biases, affecting the risk assessment of prisoners. Similar biased systems are used in crime hotspot identification, potentially resulting in disproportionate police presence in predominately black areas. Furthermore, AI used in recruitment websites such as Linkedin has shown preferences for male names in searches, all demonstrating serious implications for equality and justice.

AI software is rapidly entering decision-making processes for asylum-settlement cases which are governed by international law and involve life or death decisions. AI must be free from bias to uphold the principles of non-refoulement and non-discrimination. Unfortunately, there are cases occurring already where claimants were denied asylum status based on poor AI translations.

Whilst the European Parliament has prohibited the use of facial recognition surveillance technology, it failed to ban ‘discriminatory profiling and risk assessment systems to control border movements’ for refugees and asylum seekers. Amnesty International has called for a ban on the use of such technology in asylum cases, arguing that there is ‘no human rights compliant way to use remote biometric identification’.

The hoarding of this data exposes migrants to security breaches, which could result in serious safety concerns if data falls into the hands of the actor or state they are seeking refuge from. In 2021, thousands of Rohingya refugees had their personal biometric data passed on to the Bangladeshi government, which then passed the data on to authorities in Myanmar. For many the result of this data breach has been involuntary repatriation to Myanmar. While everyone has the right to the protection of personal data, refugees and asylum seekers are particularly vulnerable to breaches of this right, given their unfamiliarity with EU systems and willingness to comply in the pursuit of asylum.  

The collection of data using AI is a widely debated topic. While wealthy nations have put policies into place governing AI-collected data, countries in the Global South often lack the same protections. Moreover, AI developed in the Global North and deployed in the Global South may echo colonial structures of power given the  imbalance of representation in development and decision making. UK tech firms such as Cambridge Analytica have already set a poor precedent in this area by working with foreign governments during election campaigns. Using data mined through Facebook, Cambridge Analytica played a large role in the election campaign of Kenya’s former president – Uhuru Kenyatta. In doing this, Cambridge Analytica broke UK and EU data privacy laws; however, as Kenya had less stringent laws in place, they were able to employ these methods. Not only does this pose problems around the protection of individuals’ data, it also raises questions around the exploitation of lack of AI awareness in the Global South as a means for Global North companies to interfere in their politics.

The Environmental Footprint

In addition to ethical implications, unregulated AI use has environment consequences which have been relatively unexplored. Data storage centres that AI relies on consume a staggering amount of power and water, with some reports suggesting ChatGPT emits 8.4 tons of  carbon dioxide per year and that 700,000 litres of fresh water were used during the development of ChatGPT. While these instances are not independently enough in themselves to raise the alarm, the growth projection of AI suggests the environmental impact could become a major cause for concern.

As AI’s growth continues, these environmental impacts could become significant. Notably, while the Global North benefits from AI development, the Global South bears the brunt of climate-related disasters, which may worsen with AI’s expansion.

The Role of Lawyers and Advocacy

Amid these challenges, lawyers and activists have a unique role to play. While AI is still in its infancy, they can shape the regulations that protect the privacy and interests of the most vulnerable. Policy recommendations include:

• Advocate for a global ethical framework to protect data privacy, collaborating with local communities.
• Push for transparency in AI systems and data storage.
• Advocate for limited use of biometric data in asylum decisions, ensuring claimants are aware of their rights. If biometric data is to be used in asylum decisions, lawyers must advocate for proper and secure use, helping to shape a regulatory framework.
• Demand transparency in the development of algorithms and decision-making processes and establish mechanisms of accountability.
• Educate the public about AI’s implications and their rights.
• Enforce regulations to protect clients from AI exploitation in consumer markets.

In conclusion, the 2023 AI Safety Summit presents a significant opportunity to address the multifaceted impact of AI on the Global South. While AI holds the potential to uplift economies, revolutionise healthcare and education and ensure food security, it also brings the risks of economic disruption, ethical concerns, technological dependence, and environmental challenges. The key to realising the benefits of AI in the Global South lies in responsible and equitable development, guided by international cooperation and ethical principles. While AI raises significant questions and challenges, it also offers promise and hope to the development sector.

Finally, the role of the law in shaping this landscape cannot be overstated. Legal frameworks have the potential to safeguard ethical AI practices, protect vulnerable populations, promote economic growth, and reduce environmental harm. Lawyers have the opportunity to lead the way in shaping the ethical and regulatory landscape of AI to ensure its responsible and equitable use. Advocates for International Development (A4ID) is committed to being at the forefront of the AI dialogue and urges the legal profession to work together with us to pursue research into the use and regulation of AI technology through its SDG Legal Initiative, a knowledge hub for lawyers dedicated to sustainable development. Together we can harness AI’s potential while safeguarding the rights and wellbeing of all and in so doing make this vision a reality.

CEO Insight: SDG 16, Honouring Nelson Mandela’s Legacy

Earlier this month, on July 18th, the world came together to remember the profound impact of Nelson Mandela and his unwavering dedication to justice. His anti-apartheid activism has left an indelible mark, inspiring and guiding our pursuit of a fair and just world. 

Mandela’s legacy is a beacon that continues to inspire and instruct our pursuit of justice, setting a remarkable example of resilience and determination. During his 27 years in prison, he catalysed global prison reforms while relentlessly advocating for the human rights of all, even from behind bars.

To this day, Mandela’s vision resonates across the globe, influencing human rights policies and inspiring movements toward inclusive, non-discriminatory societies. The UN’s ‘Nelson Mandela Decade of Peace’  (2019 – 2028) aligns with Mandela’s principles and is firmly embedded in the Sustainable Development Agenda (SDGs) (SDGs). SDG 16, dedicated to Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions, echoes the values at the core of Mandela’s efforts against racism and for equality, calling for effective transparent institutions and non-discriminatory laws and policies.

The UN’s Adoption of The Mandela Rules

One of Mandela’s greatest contributions to the world of justice is the Mandela Rules, a set of principles promoting humane conditions for prisoners. During his imprisonment, Mandela devoted himself to legal studies, familiarising himself with legal rights and tirelessly advocating for improved treatment of prisoners. Mandela saw his firsthand experiences and observations of the dire conditions endured by black prisoners, as directly linked to the apartheid who were often treated like mere ‘cattle,’; the prison work and hunger strikes organised by Mandela and his comrades in 1966, led to transformative changes in the treatment of black prisoners. 

In 2015, the UN officially adopted the Mandela Rules, outlining obligations to uphold the inherent dignity of all prisoners as human beings. These rules mandate access to medical and health services, legal representation, and training for prison staff to ensure best practices when dealing with vulnerable groups. Crucially, they underscore the notion that prisoners remain part of wider society, promoting social cohesion and recognising their potential for growth and positive contributions even while incarcerated.

Prison Conditions across Africa Today

Despite the progress made since the adoption of the Mandela Rules, challenges persist, particularly concerning prison overcrowding. Over 121 countries and territories are operating above official capacity, some at levels of 250%, leading to life-threatening conditions and hindering proper prison functioning. Prison conditions across Africa are particularly challenging. Solitary confinement, inadequate healthcare, and the spread of infectious diseases which have higher prevalence rate in prisons.

Overcrowding not only jeopardises lives but also hampers effective rehabilitation and educational programmes, hindering prisoners’ reintegration into society upon release.  The roots of this issue lie in poor criminal justice policies rather than rising crime rates, where Conditions in African prisons remain some of the poorest in the world, and they are deeply entrenched in Africa’s colonial past, with prisons above capacity since their inception. Moreover, resource scarcity across the continent has long hindered much-needed prison reforms. High rates of pre-trial detention and overuse of prison sentences for minor offences, contribute to severe overcrowding, highlighting the need for trained judges and proper legal representation. Recent reports into prison conditions in Nigeria have shown over 60% of prison admissions, are still awaiting trial. 

The issue of police brutality further compounds problems in the justice sector, particularly in South Africa, where cases of brutality are alarmingly high, with over 5,500 cases reported each year. Suspects are often brutally beaten, even when not resisting arrest, in order to intimidate and instil fear. And 95% of cases of police brutality end with no sanctions against the officers, allowing the practice to continue. Such acts undermine trust between communities and law enforcement agencies, perpetuating conflict and mistrust. Police brutality in South Africa is systemic of its complex history, as the police are primarily seen as a repressive force, used to control a population or protect the interest of a particular group. Addressing this issue requires reimagining the role of the police force as protectors of all society, rather than a repressive entity serving elite interests. By promoting respect, transparency, and accountability, we can pave the way for a more just and harmonious society.

Policy Recommendations

To address these challenges, legal professionals, have a vital role to play in advocating for change. Our collective efforts can bring about transformative change, just as Mandela’s unwavering determination did. Let us therefore stand united in the pursuit of justice by:

• Reconceptualising the role of the police force as protectors of all citizens, diffusing tensions, and combating police brutality in communities worldwide.
• Ensuring that training programmes for prison guards are comprehensive and accessible, tackling deeply ingrained beliefs about the worth of prisoners and promoting humane treatment.
• Advocating for and investing in non-custodial alternatives to detention, such as rehabilitation programmes and community service, to reduce prison overcrowding and foster prisoners’ reintegration into society.

Improving access to justice is pivotal in ensuring a cohesive society, fair trials, and reduced prison overcrowding. The legal community has the power to drive positive change, and collaborative initiatives, like the work facilitated by A4ID in Gambia, providing technical expertise and resources to strengthen judicial systems and promote consistent sentencing guidelines thereby promoting the rule of law and sustainable development. Through such collaborations, we can empower the justice system to operate more effectively and equitably.

As we commemorate Nelson Mandela’s sacrifices this month, let us unite in building a world that truly honours his legacy. Let us recognise the inherent worth and rights of every individual and strive to alleviate hardships and uphold justice for all. Together, we can continue the profound impact of Nelson Mandela’s advocacy and create a brighter and more equitable future for generations to come.

CEO Insight: Why Sustainable Development must be Inclusive of all Genders

SDG 5: Gender Equality

Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 5 emphasises the significance of achieving gender equality by 2030. As we celebrate Pride month in June, it is a time for reflection on the history of the LGBTQIA+ community worldwide. This year, A4ID aims to shed light on the lack of recognition for trans people within SDG 5 and stress the importance of inclusive targets that embrace gender diversity. 

The UN’s SDG Agenda is driven by the principle of leaving no one behind. Therefore, the pursuit of gender equality must extend to those who do not identify with their assigned gender at birth and to those who do not conform to the binary understanding of gender (male/female). Excluding trans and gender diverse individuals from the SDGs directly contradicts the core values of the agenda and perpetuates the historical pattern of systemic exclusion and oppression faced by the LGBTQIA+ community. 

The Stonewall Uprising and the Significance of Pride 

In July 1969, the Stonewall Inn, a popular gay bar, was raided by police, resulting in the arrest of its patrons. In response, the LGBT+ community fought back, sparking a six-day period of collective action and protests demanding the right to live without fear or persecution. One year later, the community sought to commemorate the events of that night. Today, we celebrate Pride month, acknowledging the sacrifices made by the LGBT+ community in their struggle for fundamental human rights. 

During the Stonewall Uprising, male patrons dressed as women for the first time refused to undress when confronted by police officers. This defiance, which previously led to arrests for those in drag, marked a turning point. Unfortunately, even after many years, political institutions, law enforcement agencies, and judicial systems worldwide continue to unjustly discriminate against members of the LGBT+ community, particularly trans individuals. 

International Legal Frameworks

International Human Rights Law asserts that every individual deserves ‘protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity’. Furthermore, the right to have one’s gender identity recognised is rooted in the ‘right to equal recognition before the law’, as established by Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Despite these principles, trans individuals globally still struggle to obtain official documentation that aligns with their gender identity. In fact, as of 2015, only 11% of trans people in the US possessed identification that matched their gender identity. Lack of recognition by the state impacts an individual’s access to healthcare, housing, social security, freedom of movement, residence, and ‘perpetuates discrimination, violence, and exclusion in various social settings, including education and work environments’. 

In some instances, trans people are subjected to forced psychiatric evaluations, unwanted surgeries, or sterilisation, practices enforced by countries such as Japan, several US states, and 18 European countries. These practices not only defy the Yogyakarta Principles, defined by human rights groups on sexual orientation and gender identity, but are also described as state-sanctioned torture. Despite calls from the UN to legally recognise trans individuals’ preferred gender without requiring abusive procedures, many countries still fall short. In fact, we are witnessing a backpedalling on progressive gender policies due to damaging public narratives. 

The Sustainable Development Agenda and the Need for Inclusion 

While there has been increased public discourse on trans rights in recent years, trans individuals have been fighting for recognition long before the drafting of the SDGs in 2014 and 2015. However, the sustainable development agenda remains silent on addressing the specific structural inequalities faced by gender diverse people. Unlike the more limited definition of development set out in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the SDGs aim to focus on the development of people, planet, prosperity, peace, and partnerships. This inclusivity should encompass all people, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or expression. 

However, many countries that are signatories to the SDGs still uphold draconian laws that legitimise the exclusion and persecution of LGBT+ individuals. For instance, Uganda has enacted a law allowing the death penalty or life imprisonment for engaging in or promoting ‘same-sex acts’. Critics argue that by solely focusing on equal rights for women, the UN overlooks the specific barriers faced by gender diverse individuals, thereby preventing them from realising their human rights. 

Systemic Discrimination of Trans People and the Path Forward 

Opposition to recognising gender diversity is often framed as protecting national identity, traditions, or women’s empowerment. Those who oppose recognising trans people’s gender identity argue that such diversity jeopardises women’s concerns and the integrity of gender-segregated spaces. While these concerns rely heavily on anecdotal evidence, they have spurred a political response resulting in legal measures that limit the social integration of trans individuals. 

In the UK, transgender people face discrimination in both policy and public discourse. The severity of the problem was highlighted when a British transgender woman was granted asylum in New Zealand in 2017 based on her gender identity. The landmark case recognised the ‘unduly harsh’ treatment she would face if forced to return to the UK after enduring years of persecution. Unfortunately, this resolution is not available to everyone, and as a result of what has been described as an ‘epidemic of violence against trans people’, nearly half (48%) of trans individuals under 26 in the UK have attempted suicide. 

Concerning trends also emerge regarding the detention and imprisonment of trans individuals globally. In the UK, 90% of trans women in prison are housed in men’s prisons. In February this year, the UK government passed a law to ensure that no transgender women with ‘biologically male genitalia’ will be held in women’s prisons. The rationale for this decision has been based upon few instances of transgender women abusing other prisoners, however this is not a basis for such generalised discrimination. This law encourages invasive validation of an individual’s gender, reminiscent of the struggles faced during the Stonewall era. Furthermore, it invalidates an individual’s right to self-determination, which directly contradicts the principles of freedom and autonomy. 

Reports from US prisons reveal that transgender prisoners are more likely to face solitary confinement, torture, ill-treatment, and sexual abuse, particularly in immigration facilities. Moreover, laws criminalising sex work disproportionately affect trans people, exacerbating police abuse and involving them in the criminal justice system. 

In a clear violation of the Mandela Rules, a trans prisoner in Egypt was held in underground detention without natural light or outdoor activity for eight months. Additionally, despite being medically qualified for gender-affirming treatment, the individual was denied hormone therapy and subjected to a full physical examination without a prosecutorial order. 

Policy and Legal Recommendations 

Without adequate legal advocacy, trans people will continue to endure brutal conditions. More countries should follow the lead of Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, India, Nepal, New Zealand, and Pakistan by officially recognising genders other than male and female. Advocacy for legislative changes that reflect gender diversity lays the foundation for more inclusive legal and administrative systems that cater to the entire population. 

Furthermore, around the world lawyers must advocate for: easier access to official documentation based upon self-determination of gender; the ending of invasive practices; the protection of the right to self-determination; and improved access to fundamental rights and necessities for trans people. Enacting hate crime laws that establish transphobia as an aggravating factor, would also help curtail anti gender diversity narratives and reduce the amount of hate experienced by trans people on a daily basis.

Lastly, A4ID calls on the UN to promote the safety of trans individuals by recognising their rights in the SDG 5 Gender Equality targets. Currently, none of the targets or indicators explicitly address the inequalities faced by gender diverse or trans people. Organisations like the Swedish NGO RFSL have outlined detailed recommendations on how LGBTQIA+ people can be included in the existing SDGs, including SDG 5, to ensure their human rights are fulfilled. Many experts have also provided detailed recommendations on how the international community can effectively include this community in the sustainable development agenda. It is essential to incorporate targets that address the struggles faced by the trans community and work towards ending their persecution in order to achieve gender equality by 2030. 

Rule of Law

Programmes and Partnerships

Rule of Law Expertise (ROLE UK) Programme

The ROLE UK Programme works towards strengthening the rule of law and improving access to justice in FCDO-priority countries by supporting partnerships to provide high-quality pro bono legal and judicial expertise.

Learn more here

KAZA Legal Expert Network Project

The KAZA Legal Expert Network Project aims to build a network of legal experts across the Kavango-Zambesi (KAZA) region in Southern Africa, encompassing prosecutors and magistrates to better tackle the battle against the Illegal Wildlife Trade. The network wants to share and promote best practices for legal experts in KAZA, including capacity building for the network members. 

Toolbox: Monitoring & Evaluation Methods for Trainings

A4ID’s ROLE UK Programme has produced this toolbox to support those delivering trainings on rule of law issues as part of their international pro bono practice. This resource complements the tools in two earlier papers: ‘Maximising Technical Assistance to Improve the Rule of Law’ and the ‘Monitoring & Evaluation Toolbox’. It integrates the project planning frameworks and methods conveyed within the aforementioned guides and builds upon these. The specificity of this toolbox is that it focuses on M&E for training activities.

The toolbox is targeted at legal and judicial specialists undertaking, or seeking to undertake, international legal technical assistance. It will be of most relevance to professionals in the legal sector, and especially useful to those who are trying to address specific rule of law issues through targeted interventions, including trainings, and wish to understand and increase the impact of this work.

Legal Pro Bono in the Achievement of SDG 16

Since the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015, A4ID has fully embraced this agenda. A4ID’s ROLE UK Programme, with its focus on strengthening the rule of law, directly contributes to SDG 16 on Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions.

There is a robust tradition in the UK of legal and judicial professionals providing pro bono services. As part of its mission to generate and share knowledge and best practice, A4ID wants to enhance its understanding of how these pro bono efforts contribute to the achievement of SDG 16.

Through quantitative analysis of data and case studies, drawn from work supported by A4ID as well as other organisations, this paper seeks to:

• Understand how meaningfully pro bono work contributes to the achievement of SDG 16
• Assess the benefits and challenges of framing pro bono efforts in relation to the SDGs
• Draw lessons on how pro bono providers can best link their efforts to achieving the SDGs

It is our hope that this paper offers pro bono providers, and those who support them, innovative ideas and practical guidance as to how best to link their efforts with the SDG agenda.

Strengthening government lawyers’ capacity to negotiate and manage contracts

The Rwandan government faced a significant loss of public money due to delays stemming from poor quality government contracts. This, together with ineffective contract management, had long hindered government-investor relationships, negatively impacting economic growth in Rwanda.

In order to tackle this problem, the Rwandan Ministry of Justice (MINIJUST) rolled out a program of reform, and in August 2015, ROLE UK was asked to deploy three UK lawyers to provide capacity building support for the ministry on a pro bono basis. This was to include face to face advice and training sessions for legal officers to better negotiate and manage commercial contracts, jointly delivered with legal advisers from MINIJUST.

ROLE supports assignments that can demonstrate longer term sustainability and where a need for UK expertise is clear. In this instance, the DFID funded Legal Assistance for Economic Reform (LASER) programme had been working with MINIJUST since 2014 to help them improve capacity on contract management including developing model contracts.  The technical assistance requested was part of and intended to build on this work; and LASER’s ongoing programme could provide proactive follow up, which was likely to support longer-term, more sustainable outcomes.

Moreover, the Rwandan government is keen to benefit from high level technical support from the UK international pro bono sector – the genocide in Rwanda severely dented technical capacity in legal and judicial institutions and the government is committed to developing a hybrid civil-common law system.  ROLE was therefore ideally placed to support this work.

LASER identified a team of 3 lawyers, two of whom were from the Government Legal Department (GLD) and the third, a commercial lawyer in private practice to deliver the training. ROLE found that all 3 specialists had previously contributed to the contract management reform process in Rwanda through their involvement in the development of model contracts and therefore understood the background to the work well.  

The lawyers shared their knowledge and experience of drafting, negotiating and implementing contracts from one practitioner to another.  Feedback from MINIJUST showed that this genuine peer-to-peer support for government lawyers was particularly valued.

The UK team also appreciated the opportunity to work with MINIJUST and felt that what they learned from the experience would strengthen their work in the UK. This was their first experience of this kind of work and they were keen for more opportunities.

I gained a much better and more nuanced understanding of the risk transfers in a traditional works contract as opposed to Design and Build.  I gained a perspective on different approaches to legal advice that involves working across several departments. I enjoyed sharing the UK government lawyer experience and gained insight to the problems faced in complex infrastructure projects.  I will apply this knowledge in my work on major government projects.

-Lillian Arinze, GLD 

Empowering prisoners to represent themselves

Around 40% of the prison population in Kenya are held on remand without access to a fair trial.  They can remain in prison for years – a decade is not uncommon. According to a UNODC report, prisoners who are poor, have low levels of literacy and low levels of education are forced to navigate the judicial system alone where they encounter a complex labyrinth of laws, traditions, copious paperwork and restrictive time limits.

Compounded by the fact that legal aid at state expense is limited to those charged with capital offences, the poor are disproportionately more likely to remain in custody beyond constitutional limits. 

While Kenya has made good progress towards realising the rule of law, enhancing opportunities for men and women to receive representation and a fair hearing has the potential to resonate more widely on the political spectrum and increase momentum towards fairer and more just practises, thus strengthening the rule of law.

The African Prisons Project (APP), is an organisation that works to reform the criminal justice system to rehabilitate and empower prisoners, in order to reduce the number of prisoners on remand.  APP applied to ROLE UK seeking legal support to produce manuals for bail and appeals procedures, that also looked at alternative dispute resolution methods.   The manuals are intended to allow inmates to better represent themselves and each other, leading to fewer detainees.  They will also help prevent the initial incarceration of people accused of petty crimes and help divert people from a custodial sentence where it becomes more difficult to be heard.

The project aims to improve access to justice for prisoners, one of the most poor and marginalised groups, and thereby falls directly under ROLE UK’s work on improving equality and social justice.

ROLE UK supports Rule of Law assignments that are strategic in their design.  In this instance, ROLE found evidence that Coulson Harvey, a Kenyan law firm, The Law Society of Kenya, the Kenya School of Law and the Attorney General’s National Legal Aid and Awareness Programme (NALEAP) had all pledged various levels of support and involvement to the project and to wider reforms, demonstrating a larger political will and sound momentum for change. 

In addition, APP had already secured funding for the project from the Clifford Chance Foundation, along with commitments from other UK law firms to mentor students and establish legal aid clinics.  ROLE supports such collaborative approaches as they help ensure that projects are sustainable in the long run.

ROLE enabled three UK legal specialists, Tom Dunn, Director of Pro Bono at Clifford Chance, Lucy Stoy and Andrew Murn, experienced international litigators to gauge the scale and extent of the work going on, visit the sites, engage directly with the staff and prison inmates first-hand, advise on the scope of the project and help develop the legal manuals.

Our specialists found this direct, peer-to-peer approach extremely valuable, stating that it allowed them to reflect on the capacity of those who would eventually use the manuals with much greater accuracy, thereby enabling them to develop the most tailored resources. 

Feedback from Kenyan stakeholders illustrated that the visit was crucial in enabling justice system stakeholders to meet and deliberate on the best possible way forward. The fact that the UK experts visited the project sites, were familiar with domestic laws, met and engaged with the beneficiaries and crystallised working relationships with local partners was seen as genuinely facilitating progress by the Kenyans. 

“It is very good to see the UK team went through the materials sent beforehand. This greatly helped both UK and Kenya teams move ahead on the assignment from a point of understanding of Kenya Statute Law, policies and case law.”

-African Prison’s Project

Improving accountability among public officials

Complaints about maladministration in the public sector have become increasingly common in Kenya. Public officials are responsible for a variety of decisions that include whether someone is entitled to an ID card or to vote, whether their child is admitted to secondary school, or whether they get a business licence. Decisions are also made about whether a person may build in a certain place and what building standards must be respected. Equally, they could be about allocating land, extending leases or closing businesses. Mistakes or misconduct in such decision-making, disproportionately affect people who are too poor to challenge administrative decisions in court.  This poses a problem of access to justice.

An improvement in adherence to administrative law principles represents a real and practical gain for the Rule of Law. The Katiba Institute, a Kenyan organisation working to ensure implementation of Kenya’s 2010 Constitution believes that increasing Kenyan officials’ awareness of their constitutional duties will enable them to make decisions that are lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair.   In conjunction with other capacity building initiatives, a partial solution may therefore lie in developing adequate training resources.

ROLE UK supports Rule of Law projects that are rooted in the needs and priorities of end-users, that solve specific problems and are strategic. In this instance, the Katiba institute wanted external experts to help develop administrative law training resources including a Kenyan version of the UK’s Judge Over Your Shoulder (JOYS) manual; a publicly available guide to administrative law aimed at civil servants without a background in law.  As Bingham Centre research has shown, the use of the JOYS manual as a model by other countries has contributed to improved decision making and there has been strong support for the initiative amongst key Kenyan actors, such as the Ombudsman.  The initiative also aligns with other projects intended to strengthen the responsiveness and accountability of government in Kenya.

This assignment is part of a larger programme, part-funded by the FCO Magna Carta Partnership, supporting the work of the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law in London, and by a Swedish foundation supporting the work of the Katiba Institute in Nairobi.

Working with the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law, ROLE secured the involvement of two specialists to contribute to a high-level consultation convened by Katiba Institute. Steven Bramley has many years’ experience providing legal advice within the civil service and conducting legal awareness training.  He has also been at the forefront of legal awareness programme redesign in recent years and is the Legal Director at the UK Department of Communities and Local Government.  Cora Hoexter is a South African academic and a leading expert on administrative law in the jurisdiction. She has contributed to the reform of South African administrative law via the South African Law Reform Commission and to recent Kenyan administrative law reforms. 

Our specialists provided their knowledge, time and skills pro bono at the consultation which brought together Kenyan public bodies and foreign experts to discuss how a civil service guide could be devised to help implement the right to “fair administrative action” in the 2010 Constitution of Kenya.

Feedback indicates that the Bingham Centre and ROLE specialists shared their knowledge in a way that was relevant to the Kenyan audience. They judiciously pointed out the weaknesses and strengths of the UK model, highlighted points of similarity and made suggestions on how efforts to promote administrative justice in Kenya could benefit from lessons learned in their respective jurisdictions.  They provided advice on a peer to peer basis and did not advocate any particular solution. This approach empowered the Kenyans to make their own decisions about what solution fit them best.

The Kenyan School of Government and the Public Service Commission, which together are responsible for recruiting and training a large proportion of civil servants, have since said that will use Katiba’s “Kenyan JOYS” to train public officials and improve administrative decisions.

Our project was enhanced by ROLE UK who enabled us to invite senior UK and overseas experts with decades of experience in administrative justice.  Both experts more than lived u​p to the strong credentials on the basis of which they had been invited. – The Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law